Thursday, November 28, 2019

Case Study Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009 the Ongoing Battle with Microsoft and Sony Essay Example

Case Study: Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009: the Ongoing Battle with Microsoft and Sony Paper Case 1: Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009: The ongoing battle with Microsoft and Sony 1. In the video game world the most important Key Success Factor are the technological and the manufacturing related KSFs. Each generation of gaming system offered new technological advances, Nintendo was the first to bring out optical disk, which all manufactures adopted, Sega brought the breakthrough of Internet gaming. Sony combined gaming and the movie industry in one system and Microsoft created an online gaming community. Each of these concepts was adopted within their competition’s next generation of consoles in one form or another. Even within the portable gaming arena there was huge leaps made by Nintendo when they added WI-FI technology to the DS systems. As much as the technological aspect is extremely important the companies still need to be making some form of profit, this was done through the manufacturing related KSF. Nintendo was the most successful in making their product economical for the customers and themselves. When selling their system at $249. 0 they made an average of $47 dollars within its market shares. While Microsoft and Sony both were losing money on each system, as they tried to achieve gains in the software and game sales. Making leaps in the manufacturing of the systems are what truly determined the success for these companies. 2. A. STRENGTHS: †¢ Low cost of production of their products, so they are able to make a profit. †¢ Extensive amount of money and re sources to continue their innovations in technology. WEAKNESSES: †¢ A shift in customer preference of graphics and brand image over game interface. Nintendo started 2009 with a misguided strategic direction that did not take into account the economy. OPPORTUNITIES: †¢ A change in target market that focuses on game interfaces not the visual graphics. †¢ Targeting customers that have not been tapped into by the competition. THREATS: †¢ The economic recession that leads to a down turn in its Japanese, American, and European markets. †¢ The loss of Nintendo’s ability of bargaining with suppliers and customers with the falling economy. B. Nintendo has a competitive advantage over its competition. We will write a custom essay sample on Case Study: Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009: the Ongoing Battle with Microsoft and Sony specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Case Study: Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009: the Ongoing Battle with Microsoft and Sony specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Case Study: Nintendo’s Strategy in 2009: the Ongoing Battle with Microsoft and Sony specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The company has a great grasp on the economics of their products and the resources that go into their products. If they continue to keep an eye on their changing customer needs and their changes in strategic direction they will continue to retain their weaknesses to a minimum. Nintendo has more potential than its competitors considering they chose a target market that their competition overlooked. They continue to widen their scope of consumer markets, while completion suffers form continual saturation of their own markets. The gaming industry is constantly threatened by the economic changes as it is not a considered a necessity to many. With the economic change and their low cost products they may lose their bargaining power and suffer losses placing them behind their competition. Nintendo recognizing this concept shifts its strategic plan to continue to offer its customer’s the gaming experience that consumers would feel displaced if they missed. Based on the SWOT analysis this company has a great standing in its competitive advantages and they are sustainable for the future of the company.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Mothers Day Etymology Where Does Mom Come From

Mothers Day Etymology Where Does Mom Come From Mother’s Day Etymology: Where Does â€Å"Mom† Come From? Today is Mother’s Day, the day we thank our female parents for their love and patience. But where do the words â€Å"mother† and â€Å"mom† come from? Why are there so many words for mothers in English? And are they all correct? Let’s take a (motherly) look and find out. The Origins of Mother The modern English â€Å"mother† comes from the Old English term modor. And â€Å"mom,† along with other of informal or shortened terms such as â€Å"mommy† and â€Å"ma,† are often traced to this root. Interestingly, though, these shorter words may be even older. The word â€Å"mama† appears in some form in dozens of languages, including Mandarin (Mma), Hindi (mÄ Ã¡ ¹Æ') and Arabic (mÄ ma). This is because simple noises like â€Å"mama† and â€Å"papa† are among most babies’ first vocalizations. We imagine â€Å"mama† means â€Å"feed me† most of the time.(Photo: amyelizabethquinn) The theory, then, is that â€Å"mother† and its modern variations are all rooted in the baby talk of â€Å"mama.† So one thing we have in common with our earliest ancestors may be our words for â€Å"mom.†   Mom, Mum or Mam? In the US, most people call their mothers â€Å"mom.† But you may have heard â€Å"mum† or â€Å"mam† used as well, especially in other countries. So why are there so many variations on this term? Largely, it’s a matter of where you come from. The three terms we’ve picked out here, for instance, are all associated with different places: Mom is most associated with American English. Mum is common in Australia and the UK (especially England). Mam is common in Ireland, Wales, and parts of northern England. These are all accepted terms for â€Å"mother† in one place or another, so your preference will usually depend on where you grew up. And the â€Å"correct† spelling will depend on the dialect in question. But in American English, you are usually safe sticking with â€Å"mom.† But which came first? Well, â€Å"mam† is probably the oldest of the three spellings above, since the earliest recorded use of â€Å"mama† in English dates back to 1707. By comparison, the earliest appearances of â€Å"mum† and â€Å"mom† are from 1823 and 1867, respectively. Whatever your chosen term, though, we hope all the mothers out there are having a great day! And, mother or not, we hope you’ve enjoyed our etymological look at motherhood.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

The molecular mechanisms underlying differential gene expression Essay

The molecular mechanisms underlying differential gene expression control during Animals development - Essay Example The role of proteins in cellular function is crucial because they produce the building blocks for cellular structure and form enzymes that catalyze all of the cell's chemical reactions, and regulate gene expression(Alberts, 2002).The transcription of each gene is controlled by regulatory region of DNA approximately near the site where transcription begins. Regulatory regions in animals are complex and act as tiny microprocessors, responding to different kind of signals that they translate and combine to switch the neighboring gene on or off. These switching consists of two types of fundamental components: 1) Short stretch of DNA of defining sequence and 2) Gene regulatory proteins that recognize and bind to them. Moreover, different collections of gene regulatory proteins are existing in different cell types and thereby direct the patterns of gene expression that produce each cell type its special characteristics. In this essay we will focus on some epigenetic mechanisms that are res ponsible in regulating gene expression in the development of an organism from an undifferential cell, resulting in the successive formation and development of organs and parts that did not pre–exist in the fertilized egg . Firstly, the core histone proteins and linker histones have been described genetically and biochemically as likely repressive to transcriptional initiation. These proteins collect DNA into nucleosomal arrays that in turn compressed into higher-order chromatin structures that can also provide to the repression of transcription initiation and elongation. Each nucleosome core includes more than 146bp of DNA folded in two superhelical turns around an octamer containing two molecules each of the four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). DNA is forced to the surface of a positively charged ramp made up of the C-terminal histone-fold domains of the core histones. This wrapping of the double helix is stabilized by the N-terminals of the core histone that lie on the outside of the nucleosome DNA. Linker histones bind with the core histones and the linker DNA between nucleosome cores to stabilize the folding of the nucleosomal array into the chromatin fibers. This is an uneven and loosely packed solenoid with approximately six to seven nucleosomes per turn. Each turn includes at least 1000bpDNA. The dynamic properties of higher order structure and nucleosomes are seen in the movement of linker histones between different segments of chromatin and in the mobility of histones octamers between adjacent sequences. Linker histones are not essential for the assembly of higher-order chromatin structures. On the other hand, the elimination of linker histones and the associated increase in mobility of core histone DNA interactions ease transcription. Histones are the target for different types of post-translational modifications that change the structural properties of chromatin. These involve acetylation and phosphorylation of the basic N-terminal tail domains of the core histones and phosphorylation of the basic N-terminal domain of the linker histones. These modifications might be expected to make the interaction of these domains with DNA in the nucleosome less strong than usual. The real physical consequences of acetylating all of the core histone tails within the nucleosome in the absence of other proteins are relatively minor. There is a modest decrease in the wrapping of DNA around the histone octamer and nucleosome pack together less successful in array. Nevertheless, histone acetylation dose